Nobody talks about the long middle of the founder's journey. The years after conviction, but before clarity. It is the time where most startup stories are decided and characters are shaped.
I have watched version of this play out with an industrial SaaS founder I am privileged to advise. From the onset everything looked great. The company solved a hard problem uniquely, had real customers, recurring revenue, credible investors and a friendly board.
The friction showed up as the company scaled: the expectation an industrial company should grow liek a SaaS unicorn, timelines not matching reality, a bulging capital structure. Not every good business can be stretched into someone else's success story. Founder and board constantly negotiated about control vs. trust, founder ambition vs. realism, speed vs. durability. Board meetings started optimizing for a clean narrative instead of hard trade-offs. Fundraising logic started dictating operating decisions.
The founder was working harder and controlling less and the runway no longer was just financial, it became psychological.
Industrial software startups very rarely IPO. They are acquired by large industrial companies if they manage to become really large. If they are on the smaller side they get bought by private equity platforms that price EBITDA over growth.
Once those choices become explicit, everything come into focus: product calls get easier, conversations with acquirers become deliberate instead of reactive, and an exit stops feeling like failure and starts looking like completion.
This particularly ending did not produce a 10x outcome for the investors.
It did make a founder who understood the system he was in, the trade-offs it forced, and what it cost to pretend otherwise.
It did produce a very handsome outcome for the founder who is already thinking about his next venture.
No comments:
Post a Comment