Over the past decade, Schneider Electric and Emerson, two of the world’s largest industrial technology firms, followed a remarkably similar path to build scaled software businesses — without starting from scratch.
The strategy: contribute assets, take a stake, then take control.
ππ΅π¦π± 1: ππ΅π³π’π΅π¦π¨πͺπ€ ππ΄π΄π¦π΅ ππ°π―π΅π³πͺπ£πΆπ΅πͺπ°π―
Each company began by contributing its industrial software divisions — visualization, control, and simulation — into a publicly traded software player.
This wasn’t a divestiture. It was a merger of convenience: the hardware group gained a foothold in software, while the target gained scale, capital, and customers.
ππ΅π¦π± 2: ππ―π§ππΆπ¦π―π€π¦ ππ©π³π°πΆπ¨π© ππΈπ―π¦π³π΄π©πͺπ±
With roughly 55–60% ownership, the parent company gained governance control while keeping the software entity separate enough to grow independently.
It gave investors a pure-play software narrative — and the industrial parent time to mature its internal software DNA.
ππ΅π¦π± 3: ππΆππ ππ―π΅π¦π¨π³π’π΅πͺπ°π―
Once the software business had scaled, professionalized, and traded at a software multiple, the parent company moved to full ownership — bringing the software capability back into the group, now as a fully fledged SaaS business unit.
The Result:
π A controlled evolution from hardware-linked software to enterprise-scale SaaS — combining industrial domain expertise with software market agility.
The lesson:
In industrial tech, software transformation doesn’t have to be organic.
It can be architected — one equity transaction at a time.
This post was first published on LinkedIn in December 2025.
No comments:
Post a Comment